2000 Holden Commodore vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Commodore weights approximately 860 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Commodore | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Commodore | AZ |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2370 mm |