2000 Holden Commodore vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 163 more horse power than 2000 Holden Commodore. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden Commodore (304 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2000 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Commodore | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | Commodore | Commodore |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 304 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |