2000 Holden Commodore vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Commodore would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Holden Commodore. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Commodore weights approximately 224 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Commodore. (304 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden Commodore | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Commodore | Evora |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2575 mm |