2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1956 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1956 Hudson Metropolitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 544 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. (100 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 1956 Hudson Metropolitan | |
Make | Holden | Hudson |
Model | GTS-R | Metropolitan |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 100 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |