2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1962 Simca 1000
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 571 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Simca 1000. (73 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 1962 Simca 1000 | |
| Make | Holden | Simca |
| Model | GTS-R | 1000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 944 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 73 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
