2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1967 MG MGB
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG MGB would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 MG MGB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 MG MGB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG MGB. (149 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 1967 MG MGB | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | GTS-R | MGB |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |