2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 500 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | GTS-R | 120 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
