2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1972 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Suzuki Fronte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Suzuki Fronte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 604 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. (40 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 1972 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Holden | Suzuki |
| Model | GTS-R | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 36 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
