2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1975 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Datsun 260Z. 1975 Datsun 260Z has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden GTS-R has manual transmission. 2000 Holden GTS-R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Datsun 260Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 1975 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Holden | Datsun |
Model | GTS-R | 260Z |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 213 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |