2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 164. (204 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | GTS-R | 164 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 204 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |