2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1986 Rover 825i
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825i would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Rover 825i. (217 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Rover 825i.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 1986 Rover 825i | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | GTS-R | 825i |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
