2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1992 Holden Statesman
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Statesman. (401 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Statesman. 1992 Holden Statesman has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden GTS-R has manual transmission. 2000 Holden GTS-R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Holden Statesman will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 1992 Holden Statesman | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | GTS-R | Statesman |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
