2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Holden | Mercury |
Model | GTS-R | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |