2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2003 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda HR-V is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 513 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda HR-V. (131 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 2003 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | GTS-R | HR-V |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1672 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
