2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | GTS-R | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
