2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt. (203 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden GTS-R has manual transmission. 2000 Holden GTS-R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
Model | GTS-R | Cobalt |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |