2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2011 Citroen C3
To start off, 2011 Citroen C3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C3. (200 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C3. 2011 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden GTS-R has manual transmission. 2000 Holden GTS-R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 2011 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Holden | Citroen |
Model | GTS-R | C3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |