2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 525 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 2. (119 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | GTS-R | 2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 119 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |