2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2012 Audi S3
To start off, 2012 Audi S3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden GTS-R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 2012 Audi S3 | |
| Make | Holden | Audi |
| Model | GTS-R | S3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
