2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden GTS-R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander. (226 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | GTS-R | Outlander |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 166 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 226 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |