2000 Holden HRT vs. 1958 Land Rover 109
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1958 Land Rover 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Land Rover 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 658 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Land Rover 109. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Land Rover 109.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1958 Land Rover 109 | |
| Make | Holden | Land Rover |
| Model | HRT | 109 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2285 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
