2000 Holden HRT vs. 1960 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 731 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (84 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1960 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | HRT | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 43 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
