2000 Holden HRT vs. 1962 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 732 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1962 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | HRT | Herald |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1146 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |