2000 Holden HRT vs. 1964 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 670 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1964 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | HRT | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
