2000 Holden HRT vs. 1967 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1967 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Holden | Lotus |
| Model | HRT | Seven |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
