2000 Holden HRT vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 650 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | HRT | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 165 Nm |
