2000 Holden HRT vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Triumph 2.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph 2.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 593 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (222 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | HRT | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 171 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
