2000 Holden HRT vs. 1969 Volvo 164
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 605 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Volvo 164. (210 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1969 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | HRT | 164 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
