2000 Holden HRT vs. 1971 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1971 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mercury Cougar. (363 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1971 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | HRT | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 363 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
