2000 Holden HRT vs. 1972 Austin Allegro
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 711 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (104 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro. 1972 Austin Allegro has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Austin Allegro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1972 Austin Allegro | |
| Make | Holden | Austin |
| Model | HRT | Allegro |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1485 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
