2000 Holden HRT vs. 1972 Mini MK III
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mini MK III would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 754 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mini MK III. (61 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1972 Mini MK III | |
| Make | Holden | Mini |
| Model | HRT | MK III |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
