2000 Holden HRT vs. 1973 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 680 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Nissan Bluebird. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1973 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | HRT | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
