2000 Holden HRT vs. 1974 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 552 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Belmont. (263 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1974 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | HRT | Belmont |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 263 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |