2000 Holden HRT vs. 1975 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 652 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 NSU Ro 80. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 NSU Ro 80. 1975 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1975 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Holden | NSU |
Model | HRT | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |