2000 Holden HRT vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 658 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | HRT | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |