2000 Holden HRT vs. 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600 would be higher. At 6,329 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600. (500 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1978 Mercedes-Benz 600 | |
| Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | HRT | 600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 6329 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
