2000 Holden HRT vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 655 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 929. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | HRT | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |