2000 Holden HRT vs. 1981 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 707 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Talbot 1510. (108 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1981 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | Holden | Talbot |
Model | HRT | 1510 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |