2000 Holden HRT vs. 1982 Lincoln Mark VI
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lincoln Mark VI would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Lincoln Mark VI is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Lincoln Mark VI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 456 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. (359 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lincoln Mark VI. 1982 Lincoln Mark VI has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Lincoln Mark VI will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1982 Lincoln Mark VI | |
| Make | Holden | Lincoln |
| Model | HRT | Mark VI |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
