2000 Holden HRT vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 703 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | HRT | Colt |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 112 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |