2000 Holden HRT vs. 1983 Holden Statesman
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Statesman. (361 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Statesman. 1983 Holden Statesman has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Holden Statesman will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1983 Holden Statesman | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | HRT | Statesman |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5042 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 361 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |