2000 Holden HRT vs. 1983 Pontiac 6000
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Pontiac 6000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Pontiac 6000 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 632 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Pontiac 6000. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Pontiac 6000. 1983 Pontiac 6000 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Pontiac 6000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1983 Pontiac 6000 | |
Make | Holden | Pontiac |
Model | HRT | 6000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |