2000 Holden HRT vs. 1985 MG EX-E
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 MG EX-E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 MG EX-E would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1985 MG EX-E is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 MG EX-E will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 MG EX-E has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 MG EX-E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1985 MG EX-E | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | HRT | EX-E |
Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 275 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |