2000 Holden HRT vs. 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII. (386 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII. 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII | |
Make | Holden | Lincoln |
Model | HRT | Mark VIII |
Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |