2000 Holden HRT vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 509 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | HRT | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 306 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |