2000 Holden HRT vs. 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. (600 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1995 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur | |
Make | Holden | Rolls-Royce |
Model | HRT | Silver Spur |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 6749 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 600 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |