2000 Holden HRT vs. 1995 Suzuki X90
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Suzuki X90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Suzuki X90 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Suzuki X90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Suzuki X90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 682 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Suzuki X90. (133 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Suzuki X90.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1995 Suzuki X90 | |
| Make | Holden | Suzuki |
| Model | HRT | X90 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 151 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
