2000 Holden HRT vs. 1996 Mazda Levante
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Levante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Levante would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Mazda Levante is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Levante will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 625 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Levante. (190 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Levante. 1996 Mazda Levante has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Levante will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1996 Mazda Levante | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | HRT | Levante |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |