2000 Holden HRT vs. 1996 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 681 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1996 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HRT | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
