2000 Holden HRT vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz S would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mercedes-Benz S. (570 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mercedes-Benz S. 1996 Mercedes-Benz S has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mercedes-Benz S will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1996 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | HRT | S |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 389 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |